Spain has 92 double taxation treaties in force. Each one caps what Spain may withhold on dividends, interest and royalties leaving the country — and the caps vary from nothing at all to fifteen per cent. Search your country below, then read what the number does and does not mean.
It does two things. It allocates the right to tax a given kind of income between two countries, and where both may tax, it caps the rate the source country may charge and requires the residence country to give relief. For money leaving Spain, the practical effect is a ceiling: Spain's domestic withholding rate of 19% or 24% is replaced by whatever lower figure the treaty permits. The treaty never creates a tax that domestic law does not impose — it can only reduce one.
Almost every question we are asked about treaties is really one of three questions. What rate applies to my dividend, my loan interest or my licence fee. Whether I can get that rate without arguing about it. And which country gets to tax me at all, if both of them think they do. The table answers the first. The rest of this page answers the other two, because a rate you cannot actually obtain is not worth much.
One point before the numbers, because it is the most common misreading. Every figure below is a maximum, not a rate you are charged. It is the most Spain is permitted to withhold under that treaty. Spanish domestic law, or an EU directive, may already give you a better outcome — and where it does, you take the better one.
Type a country name to filter, click a region to narrow, or click any column heading to sort by rate. Each row has its own link, so a specific country can be shared directly.
| Country ▲ | Dividends general | Dividends parent-subsidiary | Min. stake % | Interest | Royalties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albania | 10 | 5/0 | 10/75 | 0/6 | 0 |
| Algeria | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0/5 | 7/14 |
| Andorra | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0/5 | 5 |
| Argentina | 15 | 10 | 25 | 0/12 | 3/5/10/15 |
| Armenia | 10 | 0 | 25 | 5 | 5/10 |
| Australia | 15 | 15 | — | 10 | 10 |
| Austria | 15 | 10 | 50 | 5 | 5 |
| Azerbaijan | 10 | 5 | 25 | 0/8 | 5/10 |
| Barbados | 5 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Belarus | 10 | 0/5 | 10 | 0/5 | 5 |
| Belgium | 15 | 0 | 25 | 0/10 | 5 |
| Bolivia | 15 | 10 | 25 | 0/15 | 0/15 |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 10 | 5 | 20 | 0/7 | 7 |
| Brazil | 15 | 10 | 25 | 0/10/15 | 10/15 |
| Bulgaria | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Canada | 15 | 5/0 | 10 | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| Cape Verde | 10 | 0 | 25 | 0/5 | 5 |
| Chile | 10 | 5 | 20 | 5/15 | 5/10 |
| China | 0/10 | 5 | 25 | 0/10 | 10 |
| Colombia | 5 | 0 | 20 | 0/5/10 | 10 |
| Costa Rica | 12 | 5 | 20 | 0/5/10 | 10 |
| Croatia | 15 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Cuba | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0/10 | 0/5 |
| Cyprus | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Czech Republic | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 0/5 |
| Dominican Republic | 10 | 0 | 75 | 0/10 | 10 |
| Ecuador | 15 | 15 | — | 0/5/10 | 5/10 |
| Egypt | 12 | 9 | 25 | 0/10 | 12 |
| El Salvador | 12 | 0 | 50 | 0/10 | 10 |
| Estonia | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0/10 | 5/10 |
| Finland | 0/15 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| France | 15 | 0 | 10 | 0/10 | 0/5 |
| Georgia | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Germany | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Greece | 10 | 5 | 25 | 0/8 | 6 |
| Hong Kong | 10 | 0 | 25 | 0/5 | 5 |
| Hungary | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Iceland | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0/5 | 5 |
| India | 15 | 15 | — | 0/15 | 10/20 |
| Indonesia | 15 | 10 | 25 | 0/10 | 10 |
| Iran | 10 | 5 | 20 | 0/7.5 | 5 |
| Ireland | 15 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 5/8/10 |
| Israel | 10 | 10 | — | 0/5/10 | 5/7 |
| Italy | 15 | 15 | — | 0/12 | 4/8 |
| Jamaica | 10 | 5 | 25 | 0/10 | 10 |
| Japan | 0/5/10 | 0 | 10 | 0/10 | 0 |
| Kazakhstan | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0/10 | 10 |
| Kuwait | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
| Latvia | 10 | 5 | 25 | 0/10 | 5/10 |
| Lithuania | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0/10 | 5/10 |
| Luxembourg | 15 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 10 |
| Malaysia | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0/10 | 5/7 |
| Malta | 5 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Mexico | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0/4.9/10 | 0/10 |
| Moldova | 10 | 5/0 | 25/50 | 0/5 | 8 |
| Morocco | 15 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 5/10 |
| Netherlands | 15 | 10 | 50 | 10 | 6 |
| New Zealand | 15 | 15 | — | 10 | 10 |
| Nigeria | 10 | 7.5 | 10 | 0/7.5 | 3.75/7.5 |
| North Macedonia | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0/5 | 5 |
| Norway | 15 | 10 | 25 | 0/10 | 5 |
| Oman | 10 | 0 | 20 | 0/5 | 8 |
| Pakistan | 10 | 7.5/5 | 25/50 | 0/10 | 7.5 |
| Panama | 10 | 5/0 | 40/80 | 0/5 | 5 |
| Paraguay | 0/10 | 5 | 50 | 0/5 | 5 |
| Philippines | 15 | 10 | 10 | 0/10/15 | 10/15/20 |
| Poland | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 0/10 |
| Portugal | 15 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 5 |
| Qatar | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Romania | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0/3 | 3 |
| Russian Federation | 15 | 10/5 | by investment | 0/5 | 5 |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 0 | 25 | 0/5 | 8 |
| Senegal | 10 | 10 | — | 0/10 | 10 |
| Serbia | 10 | 5 | 25 | 0/10 | 5/10 |
| Singapore | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0/5 | 5 |
| Slovakia | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 0/5 |
| Slovenia | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0/5 | 5 |
| South Africa | 15 | 5 | 25 | 0/5 | 5 |
| South Korea | 15 | 10 | 25 | 0/10 | 10 |
| Sweden | 15 | 10 | 50 | 15 | 10 |
| Switzerland | 15 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0/5 |
| Thailand | 10 | 10 | — | 0/10/15 | 5/8/15 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 10 | 5/0 | 25/50 | 0/8 | 5 |
| Tunisia | 15 | 5 | 50 | 5/10 | 10 |
| Turkey | 15 | 5 | 25 | 10/15 | 10 |
| United Arab Emirates | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| United States | 0/15 | 5/0 | 10/80 | 0/10 | 0 |
| Uruguay | 5 | 0 | 75 | 0/10 | 5/10 |
| Uzbekistan | 10 | 5/0 | 25 | 0/5 | 5 |
| Venezuela | 10 | 0 | 25 | 0/4.95/10 | 5 |
| Vietnam | 15 | 10/7 | 25/50 | 0/10 | 10 |
Four columns, four different logics. Getting them confused is where most planning errors start.
It means the treaty article contains conditions, and the condition decides. Reading "0/10" as "nil with the right structure" is how a 10% withholding becomes a surprise eighteen months after the loan was signed. The article text governs, and it is short enough to read.
For payments to another EU member state, the treaty is often not the relevant instrument at all. Two directives, transposed into Spanish law, can take the rate to zero where a treaty would still allow 5% or 10%.
Dividends paid by a Spanish company to an EU parent are exempt from Spanish withholding where both companies are subject to corporate tax in their member states, take a listed corporate form, and the parent holds at least 5% directly or indirectly for at least one year. The distribution must not arise from liquidation.
Royalties paid to an associated company in another member state may be exempt, generally requiring a direct 25% holding held for two years, beneficial ownership, and an arm's length amount. Separately, Spanish domestic law already exempts interest paid to EU lenders.
Neither exemption survives a structure without substance. Spanish law contains a specific rule denying the dividend exemption where the majority of voting rights in the EU parent is held by non-EU residents and the parent's incorporation is not supported by valid business reasons. Neither directive applies where the recipient sits in a listed non-cooperative jurisdiction. A holding company with no people, no premises and no decisions is the fact pattern these rules were written for.
A treaty rate is not automatic. Spanish payers withhold at the domestic rate unless they hold evidence entitling them to do otherwise, and the burden sits with the recipient to provide it before payment.
If the deadline has passed or the certificate arrived late, the position is usually recoverable through a refund claim — but it takes months, and it requires documents from a payer who by then has no commercial reason to help. Getting the certificate before the first payment is worth more than any amount of subsequent cleverness.
Withholding rates are the visible part of a treaty. The part that decides more money is the residence article, which resolves the case where each country's domestic law makes you resident. It runs as a sequence, and it stops at the first test that produces an answer.
The residence article applies only where you are resident under the domestic law of both states. If Spain considers you resident and the other country does not consider you resident at all, there is no tie to break and no treaty protection to invoke. This is the trap for people who leave a country without establishing residence anywhere else.
Treaty coverage is narrower than most people assume. These gaps account for a large share of the unpleasant surprises.
Spain has only a handful of inheritance tax treaties. For most countries — including the United Kingdom and the United States — there is no relief mechanism at treaty level, and relief depends on domestic unilateral credits. Spanish succession tax also varies enormously by autonomous community.
Social security is governed by separate bilateral agreements and EU coordination rules, not by tax treaties. VAT is outside the scope entirely. Wealth tax appears in only some treaties, so a Spanish wealth tax liability may exist with no treaty relief available at all.
Many of these treaties have been modified by the Multilateral Convention, which inserts a principal purpose test and other anti-abuse provisions without changing the text of the treaty itself. The rates in the table do not reflect it, and the consolidated position for a given pair of countries must be checked against both instruments.
Separately, note an absence: there is no Spain–Denmark treaty. It was terminated and has not been replaced, so payments between the two run on domestic rules. Absence from the table is not always an oversight.
Where we have written a full analysis rather than a rate line, it is linked here.
Residence certificates, beneficial ownership, substance and the interaction between a treaty, the directives and the MLI decide whether the number in this table is the number you actually pay. We check the position before the first payment, which is the only point at which it is cheap to fix.