Home / Insights / PE risk for Indian companies
Article 5 · Force of attraction · Six months · MLI

Permanent establishment risk in Spain for Indian companies.

The India–Spain convention is a 1993 text, and it is not the OECD model. It creates a permanent establishment in places the model does not, it does so twice as fast, and once one exists it lets Spain reach beyond it.

What creates a Spanish PE ↗ Read against the treaty text, not the model
Construction PE
6 months
Aggregated across projects. The model says twelve.
Not in the model
Sales outlet
Listed as a PE in its own right, with no threshold.
Costs the most
Attraction
Spain may tax similar sales made directly from India.
The short answer

When does an Indian company have a permanent establishment in Spain?

Through a fixed place of business — including, under this treaty, a premises used as a sales outlet — a project lasting more than six months in any twelve-month period, or a dependent agent who concludes contracts or delivers from Spanish stock. If a PE exists, Spain taxes not only its profits but similar sales made directly from India.

Most PE guidance is written against the OECD Model Convention. For this treaty that shortcut fails three times over. Signed in New Delhi on 8 February 1993, in force 12 January 1995, it reflects a period when India negotiated source-state taxing rights well beyond the model.

Three departures from the OECD model
OECD MODEL INDIA – SPAIN 1993 Construction PE after 12 months Construction PE after 6 months, aggregated Display premises are excluded A sales outlet is a PE, no threshold Spain taxes the PE only Spain also taxes similar direct sales

What creates a Spanish PE.

TriggerThreshold
Place of management, branch, office, factory, workshopNone
Premises used as a sales outletNone — not in the OECD list
Warehouse renting space to othersNone
Farm, plantation, mine, quarryNone
Installation for natural resource exploration3 months
Construction, installation or supervisory work6 months, aggregated
Same, incidental to an equipment saleUnder 6 months if fees exceed 10% of price
Services or plant hire, mineral oil prospecting30 days
Days of project activity before a PE arises
OECD model — single project365 days
India–Spain — single project183 days
India–Spain — three projects of 90 daysThreshold passed at 183
Article 5(2)(k) counts each site or project together with other such sites, projects or activities. The text does not require them to be related, or for the same customer. Three unconnected three-month jobs in one year aggregate to nine months against a six-month threshold.

The pricing trap inside the time rule.

The construction paragraph does not stop at six months. Where the work is incidental to a sale of machinery, a short project is still a PE if the fees for it cross a proportion of the equipment price.

Supply and install: the same contract, two outcomes
Contract A — install fee 8% of equipment price Equipment No PE 4 months' work Contract B — install fee 15% of equipment price Equipment PE 4 months' work 10% of sale price the line in Article 5(2)(k) Same equipment. Same four months on site. Different tax outcome, decided by how the quote was split.
Why this matters. It is a pricing test dressed as a time test, and the split between equipment and services is normally set by a commercial team that has never read Article 5.

The clause that is absent.

India's treaties with the United States and the United Kingdom contain a service PE clause: furnishing services through personnel beyond a day count creates a PE by itself. Indian outbound planning is built around it.

Better than expected

No service PE clause here

Article 5 contains no provision deeming a PE from furnishing services through personnel, apart from a narrow thirty-day rule for mineral oil prospecting. Engineers deployed to a Spanish client site do not trip an automatic day count.

The risk moves, it does not vanish

It runs through fixed place instead

Dedicated desks at a client's premises over a long engagement, or a project office, can amount to a fixed place of business without any services clause. What is removed is the automatic trigger, not the exposure.

Force of attraction.

The most consequential difference, and the one least often explained. Under the OECD model Spain taxes only what is attributable to the PE. Article 7(1) goes further.

What Spain may tax once a PE exists
Indian company Spanish PE project office, outlet, agent Direct sales invoiced from India Taxable in Spain Article 7(1)(a)–(c) Under the OECD model only the upper path is caught. Here, goods or activities of the same or similar kind are attracted too.
The planning inversion. Elsewhere the answer to PE risk is to keep the local presence small and route volume directly. Under this treaty that is the worst structure available: a presence large enough to be a PE, and a direct channel the PE pulls into charge.

Agency, and how wide it reaches.

Article 5(4) and 5(5), in sequence
Test 1
Does someone act for you in Spain?Any person other than an independent agent, acting on behalf of the Indian enterprise.
Test 2
Contracts, or stock?Habitually concludes contracts or maintains a stock in Spain from which they regularly deliver. The second limb needs no contracting authority at all.
Test 3
Is the agent genuinely independent?The carve-out is lost where the agent works wholly or almost wholly for you or your group.
Result
Agency PEAnd with it, force of attraction over similar direct sales.

Consignment stock with a Spanish logistics partner who ships on your instruction sits inside the second limb, whatever the contract calls the relationship. A Spanish agent representing one Indian principal and nobody else is not independent, however the agreement is drafted.

Five situations.

Read against the treaty text
Low risk
Direct exports onlyNo fixed place, no stock, no agent. Nothing for attraction to attach to.
Fact-driven
Engineers on a client site, 8 monthsNo service PE clause. Turns on dedicated space, continuity and control.
High
Three projects, 3 months eachAggregated to nine months against a six-month threshold.
High
Showroom in MadridA sales outlet is listed in Article 5(2). No contracting authority needed.
High
Agent with one principalIndependence removed by Article 5(5).
PE on the text
4 months' supervision at 15%Under six months, but the fee crosses 10% of the equipment price.

What a PE costs.

ConsequenceDetail
Spanish corporate taxOn attributed profits and on profits attracted to the PE.
FilingRegistration, corporate returns, VAT where applicable, Spanish accounting.
Internal chargesArticle 7(3) disallows head office royalties, know-how fees, commission, management charges and — outside banking — interest. A PE cannot be managed down by charging it a fee.
Deductible insteadGenuine executive and general administrative expenses incurred for the PE, wherever incurred.
Rate protectionLimited. The protocol expressly permits a higher rate on PE profits than on a domestic company's.

Technical fees: two routes to the same revenue.

No PE

Article 13 governs

Spain withholds on the gross fee at the treaty cap. Mechanical, and nothing to file in Spain beyond the withholding.

PE, and the contract is connected to it

Article 7 governs instead

Article 13(5) switches off the withholding article. You move to net taxation, filings, attribution — and attraction over similar revenue.

A live asymmetry

The technical services rate is not the same number on both sides.

The treaty sets 20% on technical fees and non-equipment royalties, 10% on equipment royalties. India invoked the protocol's most-favoured-nation clause by notification in 2024, referencing its convention with Germany, and substituted a 10% cap from Indian assessment year 2024-25. But the Indian Supreme Court held in October 2023 that MFN benefits require a domestic notification and are not automatic — and that notification governs what India charges. Confirm the Spanish position before budgeting a Spanish withholding rate.

The MLI sits on top.

In force for this treaty pair since 1 January 2022, effective from 1 July 2022 for Indian withholding and 1 January 2023 for Spanish withholding and other taxes. It adds a principal purpose test: a benefit can be denied where obtaining it was one of the principal purposes of an arrangement. Thresholds are unchanged; the standing of structures built to sit below them is not.

The structural answer.

01
Spanish subsidiaryArticle 5(6): control alone does not make a subsidiary a PE of its parent. The only option that removes force of attraction entirely.
02
Registered branchA PE by design, declared and filed. Worse on attraction, but far cheaper than one discovered years later with interest.
03
No presenceDirect sales, no fixed place, no stock, no dependent agent. Viable until someone needs an address in Spain.
Where this becomes a decision

The cheapest moment to decide is before the first project.

PE exposure is created by facts — how long, what premises, who signs, how the contract is priced — and each is settled early by people not thinking about Article 5. We review contracts before signature and set up the Spanish entity where one is warranted.

Book a consultation ↗
Terms in this analysis
Permanent establishment
A fixed place of business, or a deemed presence, giving the source state the right to tax business profits.
Force of attraction
Allows the source state to tax similar income earned directly, not only income attributable to the PE. In Article 7(1) here; absent from the OECD model.
Service PE
A PE arising from furnishing services through personnel beyond a day threshold. In several Indian treaties. Not in this one.
Dependent agent
A person who concludes contracts or delivers from a local stock on the enterprise's behalf.
Fees for technical services
Defined in Article 13(4) to include the provision of services of technical or other personnel.
MFN clause
Protocol paragraph 7: a rate India later grants an OECD member flows through to this treaty.
MLI
The Multilateral Convention, in force for this pair since 1 January 2022.
Principal purpose test
Denies a treaty benefit where obtaining it was a principal purpose of the arrangement.
Frequently asked
When does an Indian company create a permanent establishment in Spain?
Through a fixed place of business in Spain, including specifically a premises used as a sales outlet or a warehouse renting space to others; through a construction, installation or supervisory project lasting more than six months in any twelve-month period, counting projects together; or through a dependent agent who habitually concludes contracts or delivers goods from a stock held in Spain. Several thresholds are lower than the OECD model, and the construction rule is half the model's.
Does sending engineers to Spain create a service PE?
Not automatically. The India–Spain convention contains no service PE clause, unlike India's treaties with the United States or the United Kingdom. The only services-based deeming provision concerns mineral oil prospecting at thirty days. Exposure still exists but runs through the ordinary fixed place test: dedicated space at a client site over a long engagement can amount to a fixed place of business.
What is force of attraction and why does it matter here?
Article 7(1) allows Spain to tax not only profits attributable to the PE but also sales in Spain of goods of the same or similar kind as those sold through it, and other similar business activities carried on in Spain. Direct sales from India that never involved the PE can be taxed in Spain once a PE exists. This is absent from the OECD model, and it means a small Spanish presence can pull a large direct revenue stream into charge.
Three short projects in one year — is that a PE?
On the face of the text, very likely. Article 5(2)(k) counts a site or project together with other such sites, projects or activities, so three projects of three months each inside a twelve-month window aggregate to nine months against a six-month threshold. The clause does not require the projects to be related or for the same customer.
Can a short supply-and-install contract be a PE?
Yes. Where the project or supervisory work is incidental to a sale of machinery or equipment, lasts six months or less, and the charges for that work exceed 10% of the equipment sale price, it is a PE. It is a pricing test rather than a time test, so the outcome is often decided by how the commercial team splits the quote.
Does a Spanish subsidiary create a PE of the Indian parent?
Not by itself. Article 5(6) states that control of one company by another does not of itself make either a PE of the other. But the subsidiary must operate as a real company — if the parent effectively conducts its own business through the subsidiary's premises or staff, a PE can arise on ordinary principles. Where sustained Spanish business exists, a subsidiary is usually cleanest, precisely because it takes force of attraction off the table.
What rate applies to fees for technical services?
The treaty sets 20% for technical fees and non-equipment royalties, and 10% for equipment royalties. India invoked the protocol's most-favoured-nation clause by notification in 2024, substituting a 10% cap by reference to its convention with Germany, effective from Indian assessment year 2024-25. That notification governs Indian taxation. Whether Spain applies the same figure to payments arising in Spain should be confirmed rather than assumed.
Can I charge the PE a management fee to reduce its profit?
No. Article 7(3) expressly disallows deductions for amounts paid by the PE to head office by way of royalties, fees for patents or know-how, commission, charges for specific services or management, and — except for banking enterprises — interest, other than reimbursement of actual expenses. Genuine executive and general administrative expenses incurred for the PE are deductible wherever incurred.
What happens if a PE is discovered years later?
Spanish tax on the profits that should have been attributed, plus what force of attraction brings in, with interest and surcharges, and unfiled returns for each open year. Because attribution was never documented, the position is argued from the tax authority's reconstruction rather than yours. Voluntary regularisation before an enquiry is materially cheaper, and the gap widens every year.
Based on the Convention between the Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of India signed at New Delhi on 8 February 1993, in force 12 January 1995, and its protocol, read as modified by the Multilateral Convention for this treaty pair. Diagrams are illustrative simplifications of the cited articles. Permanent establishment is intensely fact-specific and the same contract can produce different outcomes on different facts. General information as at September 2026, not tax advice.

A 1993 treaty, and it is not the model. Read it before you sign.

Book a consultation ↗
20 minutes · No commitment · Straight answers
About the author
AB

Alexander Baranov

Founder, Voixa Consultors · International corporate structuring since 2008

Seventeen years designing and delivering cross-border corporate structures — incorporation, tax, holding, banking and market entry — for founders and companies expanding into Spain and the EU. Author of professional books on entering the Spanish market.

More about Voixa and the team ↗
Market Entry to Spain book cover
Book · Kindle
Market Entry to Spain Strategy, corporate structure, tax and growth — the long-form treatment of the decisions covered here.
Read on Amazon ↗